U.S. District Judge David Hale ruled on April 1 that there’s ample evidence that could be seen as supporting allegations that the protesters’ injuries were a “direct and proximate result” of Trump’s actions. The judge also noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.
The response filed by Trump contradicts the argument of a co-defendant, a Trump supporter accused of shoving a young black woman at the rally. WDRB-TV reported (http://bit.ly/2oed0Tu ) that 75-year-old Alvin Bamberger said he was only following Trump’s directions when he helped remove her.
Bamberger filed a countersuit in U.S. District Court on Friday, saying “he would not have acted as he did without” Trump’s “urging and inspiration.”
Bamberger also cited other Trump rallies, saying Trump and his campaign “repeatedly urged people attending” the rallies to “remove individuals who were voicing opposition to Trumps candidacy” and promised to pay the legal fees of those who removed protesters.